-
Author
-
November 7, 2013 at 02:20 #6164DouweboschmaParticipant
I couldn’t swap “I am a” – “looking for a” because the field for “looking for a” was missing in:
Select Matching Fields (optional).
I used my whole evening on this just to find out that “Select Matching Fields (optional).” ONLY! counts for drop downs! I changed it to select boxes (at your advice) because on my site it is kind of essetial that people are able to search broader than one type of person.
So I am kind of stuck with this one.
Can you help me out?
November 8, 2013 at 01:42 #6229SQadminKeymasterMatching fields can be textboxes or selectboxes. If you stick to those types then you will be fine
Hi there!!! Help others from the community and mark any reply as solution if it solved your question. Mark as a solutionNovember 8, 2013 at 01:44 #6230DouweboschmaParticipantSo there is not possibillity for multiple selection in the “I am” – “Looking for” search?
November 8, 2013 at 03:00 #6253DouweboschmaParticipantHi found this post:
https://archived.seventhqueen.com/forums/topic/building-search-queries-for-non-dating-sites
I understand there it is styling disallowing. Could you plz tell how to disable that so that I can search against selectboxes with a multiple select?
November 9, 2013 at 01:25 #6307SQadminKeymasterHi, You can use multiselect starting with 2.2 but you cannot use them as Matching fields. They are different field types that saves data different…
Hi there!!! Help others from the community and mark any reply as solution if it solved your question. Mark as a solutionNovember 9, 2013 at 01:28 #6311DouweboschmaParticipantOk thanks… I have to think then how to solve that issue of many users requestiong to select several types in “looking for”
November 10, 2013 at 00:18 #6360SQadminKeymasterUnfortunately it can’t be easily resolved
Hi there!!! Help others from the community and mark any reply as solution if it solved your question. Mark as a solutionNovember 10, 2013 at 02:22 #6363DouweboschmaParticipantHi…
I think I found some kind of solution though! I still need to implement it (and edit the profiles that already have been made. 😉
I am posting this here because othes might run into the same thing.
The idea is to split up.
I am/ we are a: (dropdown)
Man
Woman
Couple
OtherWho is/ are: (checkboxes)
Hetrosexual
Bisexual
Gay
Gender fluid
Pansexual
Queer
Genderqueer
Cross-dresser
Transgender
Androgynous
QuestioningLooking for a: (dropdown)
Man
Woman
Couple
OtherWho is/ are: (checkboxes of which the results are only to show on the profile)
Hetrosexual
Bisexual
Gay
Gender fluid
Pansexual
Queer
Genderqueer
Cross-dresser
Transgender
Androgynous
QuestioningIn this way the basic matching is gender based but then extended with the check boxes. Like this several options/ combinations can be made. Most will search specifically for a gender but like this one can still specify her self as a female, gay, queer. for instance.
The solution is that I still can turn the fields around and sneak the first “Who is/ are” into the search. als “I am/we are a:” (dropdown)…. “Iooking for a:”(dropdown) “Who is/are:” (checkboxes)
I think this will work…
Thanks for looking into it.
Douwe
November 12, 2013 at 00:10 #6434SQadminKeymasterYes, this logic might help you achieve what you want.
Regards,
AbeHi there!!! Help others from the community and mark any reply as solution if it solved your question. Mark as a solution -
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘Sweetdate – WordPress’ is closed to new topics and replies.