This topic has 8 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years by SQadmin.

  • Author
  • #6164
     Douweboschma
    Participant

    I couldn’t swap “I am a” – “looking for a” because the field for “looking for a” was missing in:

    Select Matching Fields (optional).

    I used my whole evening on this just to find out that “Select Matching Fields (optional).” ONLY! counts for drop downs! I changed it to select boxes (at your advice) because on my site it is kind of essetial that people are able to search broader than one type of person.

    So I am kind of stuck with this one.

    Can you help me out?

    #6229
     SQadmin
    Keymaster

    Matching fields can be textboxes or selectboxes. If you stick to those types then you will be fine

    Hi there!!! Help others from the community and mark any reply as solution if it solved your question. Mark as a solution
    #6230
     Douweboschma
    Participant

    So there is not possibillity for multiple selection in the “I am” – “Looking for” search?

    #6253
     Douweboschma
    Participant

    Hi found this post:

    https://archived.seventhqueen.com/forums/topic/building-search-queries-for-non-dating-sites

    I understand there it is styling disallowing. Could you plz tell how to disable that so that I can search against selectboxes with a multiple select?

    #6307
     SQadmin
    Keymaster

    Hi, You can use multiselect starting with 2.2 but you cannot use them as Matching fields. They are different field types that saves data different…

    Hi there!!! Help others from the community and mark any reply as solution if it solved your question. Mark as a solution
    #6311
     Douweboschma
    Participant

    Ok thanks… I have to think then how to solve that issue of many users requestiong to select several types in “looking for”

    #6360
     SQadmin
    Keymaster

    Unfortunately it can’t be easily resolved

    Hi there!!! Help others from the community and mark any reply as solution if it solved your question. Mark as a solution
    #6363
     Douweboschma
    Participant

    Hi…

    I think I found some kind of solution though! I still need to implement it (and edit the profiles that already have been made. 😉

    I am posting this here because othes might run into the same thing.

    The idea is to split up.

    I am/ we are a: (dropdown)

    Man
    Woman
    Couple
    Other

    Who is/ are: (checkboxes)

    Hetrosexual
    Bisexual
    Gay
    Gender fluid
    Pansexual
    Queer
    Genderqueer
    Cross-dresser
    Transgender
    Androgynous
    Questioning

    Looking for a: (dropdown)

    Man
    Woman
    Couple
    Other

    Who is/ are: (checkboxes of which the results are only to show on the profile)

    Hetrosexual
    Bisexual
    Gay
    Gender fluid
    Pansexual
    Queer
    Genderqueer
    Cross-dresser
    Transgender
    Androgynous
    Questioning

    In this way the basic matching is gender based but then extended with the check boxes. Like this several options/ combinations can be made. Most will search specifically for a gender but like this one can still specify her self as a female, gay, queer. for instance.

    The solution is that I still can turn the fields around and sneak the first “Who is/ are” into the search. als “I am/we are a:” (dropdown)…. “Iooking for a:”(dropdown) “Who is/are:” (checkboxes)

    I think this will work…

    Thanks for looking into it.

    Douwe

    #6434
     SQadmin
    Keymaster

    Yes, this logic might help you achieve what you want.

    Regards,
    Abe

    Hi there!!! Help others from the community and mark any reply as solution if it solved your question. Mark as a solution
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

The forum ‘Sweetdate – WordPress’ is closed to new topics and replies.

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?